Archive for the ‘What’s Left’ Category

The Return of Feudalism?

Sunday, June 14th, 2009

     I had been updating one of my useful (not earth-shatteringly important) slide shows a couple months ago in an effort to help explain to my fellow Airmen what had been transpiring in the larger economy and to try to help them understand where we were likely to go.  In the process of looking forward I wanted to give a quick look back.  I ran them all the way back to feudalism.  In the process of researching what I thought would be a bullet that amounted to an historical footnote, I ran across a blog article on Mises.org called The Return of Feudalism that I thought I’d check, just in case we really did end up running the clock all the way back. 

     Is it possible we could be running all the way back full-circle to feudalism (either through or bypassing mercantilism on the journey)? I can’t say I’m fully confident in the direction we’re heading.  It seems like there are too many people who have departed from smart game-playing who keep saying we’ll be able to fix the big problems via gimmicky (nuanced!) trick plays; as though one could get to and win the Super Bowl not with a West Coast offense but by making the fake field goal/punt or reverse handoff their standard tactic.  Sometimes I wonder if we aren’t headed toward some sort of feudal version of the information economy.  Some people, I’m sure, never doubted we’d left it (didn’t Marxists equate industrial capitalists with medieval robber barons? Why robber barons and why not the prior established aristocracy? I digress). 

     In the feudal era, those hardy souls who were mightier than the others of their tribe rose to prominence to become chieftains through the divine right of might.  These gave way over time to landowning aristocrats who swore fealty to those with the divine right of kings.  That age was largely overcome by industrialists wielding the divine right of capital backed by court-enforced contracts.  Not satisfied with material wealth, or not appreciating it, we seem at the dawn of the information age to be also entering the age of the divine right of intellect.  Who will be the gatekeepers and the power-wielders of this age? So far they seem to be folk so shrewd that they’re fooling no one but themselves.

     Good luck plowing the land with your high IQ, fellas!

A Reduction in the Defecit? Cool!

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

     I must admit I had my doubts that the Federal Government would be able to reduce the deficit by half within the next few years like it said it would.  I thought later that I saw a possible way to make it happen.  I spent over twenty pages trying to explain and came to the conclusion that in order for the deficit to be halved, the Federal government will have to raise revenues (taxes) or cut spending.  I’ll leave that to you the reader to determine which avenue will be the most likely.

     The file I developed should be light reading (if you’re into economics)! Enjoy it if you can! I’ll post it in the Pages section.  Unfortunately I was unable to copy the figures (which had been screen shots from graphs generated by an Excel spreadsheet I seem to have left on another computer somewhere).  I’ll try to find them and get them updated. 

 

My Quick Take on the Possibility of Inflation

Sunday, May 10th, 2009

    Most of us know that the government is having Treasury spit money off the presses at the Mint fast enough to beat Jeff Gordon in the Daytona 500.  Typically when this occurs, inflation rears its ugly head and devours the real value of any of my holdings in a bank.  As I was thinking of ways to build a better shield to ward off this recurring demon, I began wondering if inflation would really become a problem at all.

     It may sound insane, but think about it:  For the past 12 years, much of our "economic gain" has occurred using credit, or in other words money that wasn’t really ever there to begin with.  So perhaps to a large extent the newly minted reduced-value dollars will simply be replacing money that never existed in the first place.  Maybe we can afford to print a lot for a little while and suffer no net inflation?

     Thoughts?

Mentally, but not Physically

Wednesday, November 5th, 2008
     If anyone needs me, I’ll be clinging to my religion. 

The New York Enquirer

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

     This may be the only thing I’ve ever read or heard from Michael Kinsley that was worth repeating.  This was hilarious!

     What’s fun is that I now get to find the Times’ most egregious errors, publish only their failures, claim that based on their ineptitude that their product is worthless, and call for everyone to stop reading the Times

     The parallels here compared to what they’ve been doing to us in the military with respect to Iraq are uncanny. 

     It’s like poetic justice. 

     Hat tip to HoyStory.

Ridiculosity

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

     I’m not really sure what’s more ridiculous:  Taser parties (a lá Tupperware parties), or Amnesty International’s position on the non-lethal devices. 

 Because of safety concerns and potential for abuse, we do not believe Tasers should ever be used as a low or medium level force option by police officers. Nor should they be permitted for sale to the general public.

     As soon as everyone gets a 24/7 armed bodyguard contingent from AI, they can then take positions like this with some credibility.  AI does not have the right to declare that I don’t have the right to defend my family and myself with force I deem appropriate for the situation.  

     AI needs to stop picking the low-hanging fruit in the western world and concentrate fully on the serious problems in places like Darfur, Zimbabwe, Iran, and North Korea before it moves on to other slightly less serious problem areas like Russia, Saudi Arabia, and China.

     *Update* From Hobbes’ The Leviathan:

And therefore there be some rights which no man can be understood by any words, or other signs, to have abandoned or transferred. . . A covenant not to defend myself from force, by force, is always void.

A Special Comment Just for Keith Olbermann

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2007
 

     Take your own advice

     Your basic worldview is, to put it nicely, screwed up.  It’s so screwed up that it causes you to not understand events happening in the world around you.  You’re not ‘misinformed’ so much as you are ‘clueless.’  What it all really boils down to is since you don’t understand the way the world works, you don’t support good causes, and therefore you don’t support the President.  But you’re so rabid yourself that you can’t abide a chief executive that guides the country on morality and conscience, so you feel compelled to suggest he leave office.  Your rage has unbalanced you.  Your rage makes you a poor source of information.  You cannot be trusted. 

     What more needs to be said about a clueless commentator whose show has a segment called ‘The Worst Person in the World?’ 

     You Shut Up

Another One-hour Countdown

Friday, June 15th, 2007
     As I was writing the post in memory of Robin Olds, I was listening to the TV news in the background.  AFN Pacific plays MSNBC’s Countdown from 9-10 AM.  Normally, I turn the TV off as soon as I hear Keith Olbermann’s voice.  Today he’s got a woman named Alison Stewart on for him.  I don’t believe her any more than I believe him, but she’s much easier on the eyes (and ears) than Olbermann.